Anyone ever had this conversation with a toddler?
Adult: "Do you want cereal or pancakes for breakfast?"
Toddler: "I want ice cream."
Adult: "Listen to the choices: pancakes or cereal."
Adult: "Do you want cereal or pancakes for breakfast?"
Toddler: "I want ice cream."
Adult: "Listen to the choices: pancakes or cereal."
Adult: "Do you want cereal or pancakes for breakfast?"
Toddler: "I want ice cream."
I now close this scene prematurely and leave to your imagination where it goes from there. Could be good; could be bad.
I transpose this conversation now to politics.
Adult: "Do you want Obama or Romney for President?"
Answer the question. Unacceptable toddler answers include any name that is NOT Obama or Romney; toddler answers also include: " I am not going to vote." "I will now have a tantrum because I don't like my choices." And the ever popular: "You are mean!"
Do you want Obama or Romney for President? I am only going to ask this once....
Saturday, September 1, 2012
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Ashamed of God: Why Peter Enns Gets It Wrong, Again.
Dr. Peter Enns recently engaged Pastor John Piper (here) on the Biblical record of God's judgment of the Canaanites. Dr. Piper's answer to the question (How Could God Kill Women and Children?) can be found on his site.
Dr. Peter Enns parted ways with Westminster Theological Seminary some years back over his views of inspiration and, coincidentally, the issue at the heart of his exchange with Piper. Enns left BioLogos a few months ago and was quoted as saying, "They are moving in a more conservative direction, i.e., keeping Southern Baptists and other literalists on board."
In this exchange, Enns highlights Piper's opening statement, who in a typical Piperian flourish presents his view in bold, almost, shocking frankness. Nevertheless, Piper does state the Biblical view correctly.
The judgment of the Canaanites, promised by God in Genesis 15:16, was to follow 400 years of mercy and warning. The destruction of Sodom was an early warning sign to that culture. Abraham, Melchisedek, Isaac and others spoke of and for God to that culture.
My point in this brief essay is to simply point out why Dr Enns gets this all wrong. Sadly his error is very simple.
First, his view of God is wrong. Peter Enns makes his god in the image of Peter Enns. Enns decides what is right and wrong and "God" must conduct himself accordingly. The God of the Bible embarrasses Enns.
Second, his view of Scripture is wrong. Enns insists that Divine judgment is inconsistent with the message of the New Testament. He ignores Christ's warning that judgment for Tyre and Sidon will be worse than that of Sodom.
Enns gets it wrong.
Dr. Peter Enns parted ways with Westminster Theological Seminary some years back over his views of inspiration and, coincidentally, the issue at the heart of his exchange with Piper. Enns left BioLogos a few months ago and was quoted as saying, "They are moving in a more conservative direction, i.e., keeping Southern Baptists and other literalists on board."
In this exchange, Enns highlights Piper's opening statement, who in a typical Piperian flourish presents his view in bold, almost, shocking frankness. Nevertheless, Piper does state the Biblical view correctly.
The judgment of the Canaanites, promised by God in Genesis 15:16, was to follow 400 years of mercy and warning. The destruction of Sodom was an early warning sign to that culture. Abraham, Melchisedek, Isaac and others spoke of and for God to that culture.
My point in this brief essay is to simply point out why Dr Enns gets this all wrong. Sadly his error is very simple.
First, his view of God is wrong. Peter Enns makes his god in the image of Peter Enns. Enns decides what is right and wrong and "God" must conduct himself accordingly. The God of the Bible embarrasses Enns.
Second, his view of Scripture is wrong. Enns insists that Divine judgment is inconsistent with the message of the New Testament. He ignores Christ's warning that judgment for Tyre and Sidon will be worse than that of Sodom.
Enns gets it wrong.
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Meeting the Enemy
I was 5 hours away, blessedly exempt from the chicken pox
quarantine, when my wife called to tell me the doctor thought the baby had, perhaps,
a broken bone in her hand. I preached
that night and drove home. When we
finally got the correct diagnosis, I was furious with the first pediatrician
and my anger added to my wife’s anxiety.
Monitoring the spider bite was surreal as we watched our
baby that night – what were we watching for I wondered? Then it passed; I did not know how much that
episode would take from us just then.
Hindsight tells me I should have been more observant
about the stress levels all these things cumulatively were adding. I have never
discussed the anonymous calls we were receiving – ominous calls – vague but
more frequent when I was out of town.
I am hesitant even now to talk about the
spiritual warfare that was being waged in and around us. I would later learn about some of it and some
of it I would never fathom or grasp. We turned over some rocks in that ministry
that revealed racism, prejudice and hatred that still today sadden me. God
granted some victories and some courage; but I did not know at what cost they
were coming.
Founders Ministries Blog: "The Southern Baptist Convention: Retrospect and P...
Founders Ministries Blog: "The Southern Baptist Convention: Retrospect and P...: Dr. Tom Nettles spoke at the 2012 Founders Breakfast in New Orleans before the opening session of the annual meeting of the Southern Bapti...
Friday, June 15, 2012
Second Thoughts
You need to read First Things First before you read this post. Read it, and then return here.
I remember that spring morning. I remember some moments in my life so vividly that they scroll through my mind like a powerpoint. Brief glimpses from my childhood and from big events that are almost overshadowed by the photographs of them, but some moments I remember.
I remember the first time I saw the woman who would become my bride. She thinks I did not notice her in the orientation where I gave a perfunctory greeting. I noticed. She was the most beautiful girl in the room.
Before you judge me as shallow or superficial, I did my due diligence and discovered that she was a freshman, having graduated with honors from high school and coming highly recommended by her church and school. I learned that she did have a boyfriend; but I was undeterred by that small insignificant obstacle.
I remember that moment when she, radiantly beautiful, stood by my side exchanging our wedding vows. Three years later, when she knocked on the door of my classroom in the school where we both taught, telling me we were expecting our first child, she shone like a new diamond. Four times I watched her go through natural childbirth and in each delivery I remember a moment when her grace and strength gave her a beauty I will never forget. Those moments would be helpful harbingers in days to come.
My wife’s humility has never allowed her to agree with my assessment of her physical beauty and yet she knew I felt that way. That would bring greater anxiety in the severe mercy that would assault her self-image and her physical appearance.
That Sunday morning when she called me, devastated, I did not know what to do, think or say. I have a habit of reflexively saying, “It will be alright.” Comforting at times but I am sure sometimes downright annoying. These blogs will help us tell about the journey of faith and fear, mountain tops and valleys that followed.
I remember that spring morning. I remember some moments in my life so vividly that they scroll through my mind like a powerpoint. Brief glimpses from my childhood and from big events that are almost overshadowed by the photographs of them, but some moments I remember.
I remember the first time I saw the woman who would become my bride. She thinks I did not notice her in the orientation where I gave a perfunctory greeting. I noticed. She was the most beautiful girl in the room.
Before you judge me as shallow or superficial, I did my due diligence and discovered that she was a freshman, having graduated with honors from high school and coming highly recommended by her church and school. I learned that she did have a boyfriend; but I was undeterred by that small insignificant obstacle.
I remember that moment when she, radiantly beautiful, stood by my side exchanging our wedding vows. Three years later, when she knocked on the door of my classroom in the school where we both taught, telling me we were expecting our first child, she shone like a new diamond. Four times I watched her go through natural childbirth and in each delivery I remember a moment when her grace and strength gave her a beauty I will never forget. Those moments would be helpful harbingers in days to come.
My wife’s humility has never allowed her to agree with my assessment of her physical beauty and yet she knew I felt that way. That would bring greater anxiety in the severe mercy that would assault her self-image and her physical appearance.
That Sunday morning when she called me, devastated, I did not know what to do, think or say. I have a habit of reflexively saying, “It will be alright.” Comforting at times but I am sure sometimes downright annoying. These blogs will help us tell about the journey of faith and fear, mountain tops and valleys that followed.
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Blind Love and Blessings
In the next several posts I will be reflecting on a common story. told by my wife and me. To quote my wife:
"My husband and I have agreed to relate the story by telling it through two different perspectives, his and mine, and by means of two different blogs, his and mine. We agree that it is risky to leave ourselves open to either criticism and/or voyeurism but it seems the only way to give the glory to our God. To not talk about the things the Lord has taught us is to fail to acknowledge God’s goodness."
I ask that you first read Blind Love and Blessings
And stay tuned.
"My husband and I have agreed to relate the story by telling it through two different perspectives, his and mine, and by means of two different blogs, his and mine. We agree that it is risky to leave ourselves open to either criticism and/or voyeurism but it seems the only way to give the glory to our God. To not talk about the things the Lord has taught us is to fail to acknowledge God’s goodness."
I ask that you first read Blind Love and Blessings
And stay tuned.
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Top Ten Myths about Bullies
In which an effort is made to dispel the most egregious
errors encountered by those forced to confront said villainous behavior and in
which the author recounts, with understandable ambiguity, assorted personal
trials and tribulations which, in anecdotal fashion, supply the modest
verification of the theses set forth
It becomes necessary at
the outset to define our term lest any reader be misled and wade through
the arguments presented only to discover it is not a topic of interest to them and thereby a waste of their time. To
those remaining at the end of the article: no refund of time or energy will be
given nor will there be any legal recourse available to you in protest of
said policy.
To be clear this essay is not about fish found in or around New Zealand, known as "bully" fish such as pakoko or titarakura - small freshwater fish of the genera Gobiomorphus and Philynodon.
To be clear this essay is not about fish found in or around New Zealand, known as "bully" fish such as pakoko or titarakura - small freshwater fish of the genera Gobiomorphus and Philynodon.
Neither is
the discussion at hand concerned with the adjective “bully” i.e. dashing, jolly, my bully boy nor the interjection "bully" used as "bully for you, well done! bravo!
And lastly, although this
one offers etymological mysteries worth exploring, this essay makes no investigation
of “bully” as used in the 1500’s: "sweetheart,"
applied to either sex, from the Dutch boel "lover,
brother."
Oh, and one more
disclaimer; this essay makes no further statement about “bully” as a
desperate, freewheeling scramble for a Soccer ball by a number of players, usually in the goal area; nor about “bully”
in Field Hockey - a method of putting
the ball into play in which two
opponents, facing each other, tap their sticks on the ground near the ball and then
make contact with each other's sticks over the ball three times, after which
each tries to gain possession of
the ball.
Those readers who
have persisted to this point are well advised and well equipped to understand
the general purpose of this essay. I
trust both of you will leave a comment.
[LEGAL HAS ASKED ME TO INSERT HERE A
DISCLAIMER TO THE EFFECT THAT NO WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, ATTENDS TO ANY
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED HEREWITH.]
Acceptable
definitions of bully include; a blustering, quarrelsome, overbearing person who
habitually badgers and intimidates smaller or weaker people; and similarly - a person who hurts, persecutes, or intimidates weaker people.
Through my lifetime – and I
do not intend this to be my last will and testament (unless all of the sundry
bullies I have encountered happen to read this, unite and form a coalition to ….
well let’s not dwell on that thought) – through my lifetime I have read about,
watched and heard about bullies; their number is legion (and perhaps their
name, too.) I have read about historical figures who qualify; I have known many
fictional and real bullies; the Bible has a veritable menagerie of them – for some
reason King Ahab comes to mind, although the real villain of that story is
Queen Jezebel – but I must ask the reader to stop interrupting my train of
thought because – let’s see, where was I – oh yes! Bullies I have known.
I only mention all this to
make the self-serving statement that I know about bullies. I have suffered at
their devices, at times stood up to them, and on the rare occasion seen some of
them handily defeated. I only offer in
this essay a list of the greatest and most dangerous myths about bullies.
Myth Number 10: “If someone makes you cry or will not let you
have your way, they are a bully.”
Not necessarily; in most
cases it just means you are a crybaby, or selfish, or spoiled, or lazy or well,
that’s the general idea.
Myth Number 9: “Bullies only
know how to use their brawn, not their brains.”
Again, not necessarily. Some bullies are very, very, smart. This is a dangerous assumption and leads
people to try and “out think” the bully when a better option might be to “out
run” the bully. Looks cowardly but sometimes discretion is the better part of
valor. As Bret Maverick once said, “He who runs away lives to run away another
day.”
Myth Number 8: “If you stand
up to A Bully, they will back down.”
No. No. No! Sometimes that
only brings you into range to have the living daylights beaten out of you. I was told this myth as a child and
implemented it unsuccessfully on a number of occasions. I have also made this
mistake as an adult; some lessons are harder to learn than others.
Myth Number 7: “No one likes a
Bully.”
Heard that one in the
third grade. Turns out many of the
girls liked him a lot; some of the boys
admired and followed him like ducklings imprinted on a Mama Duck and one of the
teachers thought he was “made of sterner stuff” than the rest of us and the
bully’s dad bragged that “he was a chip off the ole block.” Stand up to a bully
in some crowds and the crowd will beat the living daylights out of you. Trust me on this one. This is a true story.
Myth Number 6: “Bullies will
grow up and out of their bullydom.”
Again, I have seen no
statistical or even anecdotal evidence to verify this. What I have seen is
bullies get older, bigger and meaner. Not all of them mind you; some of them
get the living daylights beaten out of them along the way. Sad, but true. As the little girl said, “I’ll cry all night”
when that happens.
Myth Number 5: “Bullies only
use their physical advantage to get their way.”
Now this is a slight
variation of myth number 9 but it deserves emphasis. I have seen bullies use every tool, every
technique, and every trick imaginable. I
have seen rich bullies use money; I have seen poor bullies use poverty; I have
seen sad people use grief, sick people use illness, officials use their office;
friends use guilt, scholars use credentials, preachers use pulpits, reporters
use microphones, fools use folly and whole groups of people use history –
all in blatant efforts to bully others.
Myth Number 4: “Bullies get
what’s coming to them.”
Not in this life – not on
your life. I know judgment is coming;
but I recommend that you leave vengeance to God and to eternity. Don’t waste
time and energy in the here and now watching or waiting or trying to get even
or justice or satisfaction.
Myth Number 3: “Bullying is
caused by _________.”
Now, first a confession to
my readers, or reader if that other fellow left early – I rather
arbitrarily chose 10 for this list, knowing I could at any time change it to 11
or 7 or 5; writers seldom mention that but it is more common than most list
makers would like you to know; however number 3 could be expanded to make this
a list of 27 or 37 things about bullying that no one would ever read. My point
is that you can fill in that blank with anything you can think of - sports, business, religion, patriarchy, matriarchy, fallen arches – or preface those
with “the lack of: sports, business, religion, patriarchy, matriarchy, golden
arches – you get the idea. The fact
is bullying occurs anywhere and everywhere; in church, out of church, in the best
neighborhood, and in the worst. In the courtroom, in the cloakroom, in the boardroom,
in the locker-room, in the bedroom, in the classroom, in the – well,
everywhere. Bullying is just one more manifestation of sin that comes from the
human heart.
Myth Number 2: “We should make
bullying illegal.”
I would draft this
legislation, vote for this legislation, enforce this legislation - if it would
work; but – and this is very controversial but still true – it will not work.
At best, it is a futile gesture; at worst, it is another form of bullying; ironic, I
know, but sadly true. You may be happy
to know that the conduct of bullies is often illegal and already
punishable by fines, and/or incarceration; and the court of public opinion
(usually) frowns upon it. There is often
a great deal of head-shaking, hand-wringing about it (with stern letters to
follow) but that’s about it. The fact is it cannot be outlawed, proscribed or
made void where prohibited. It’s rather like the cockroaches of which bullies
often remind me. Ubiquitous, unstoppable and inescapable this side of the Great
White Throne Judgment.
Myth Number 1:
And before I list this
last myth, permit me a brief moment of self-congratulatory self-satisfaction
about guessing right on the number of myths; I was mowing my lawn in between
times and had to wait for it all to take shape in the grist forming in the mill
of my mind… anyway
Myth Number 1: “Bullies ruin everything.”
Oddly, you might want to
argue with me about this one; but hear me out.
In my final analysis, I do not think the bully ruins anything; don’t get
me wrong – it’s not for lack of effort; there is much thrashing, and weeping
and wailing, much sound and fury – but it signifies nothing. The bully causes
my backbone to stiffen; he still causes me to step into the arena, he still
makes me want to defend and protect the weak, to speak the truth, to stand for
right – even if I stand alone. And when I lay my head on my pillow at night,
when my conscience assesses my day, when I stand before my Judge – I will not
be sorry that I did.
P.S. Christians will understand about the Others:
Hebrews 11:32-40 32 And what shall I more say? for the
time would fail me to tell of Gedeon, and of Barak, and of
Samson, and of Jephthae; of David also, and Samuel, and of
the prophets: 33 Who through faith
subdued kingdoms, wrought righteousness, obtained promises, stopped the mouths
of lions, 34 Quenched the violence
of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, out of weakness were made strong, waxed
valiant in fight, turned to flight the armies of the aliens. 35 Women received their dead raised to life
again: and others were tortured, not accepting deliverance; that
they might obtain a better resurrection: 36 And
others had trial of cruel mockings and scourgings, yea, moreover of
bonds and imprisonment: 37 They
were stoned, they were sawn asunder, were tempted, were slain with the sword:
they wandered about in sheepskins and goatskins; being destitute, afflicted,
tormented; 38 (Of whom the world
was not worthy:) they wandered in deserts, and in mountains, and in
dens and caves of the earth. 39 And
these all, having obtained a good report through faith, received not the
promise: 40 God having provided
some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)