Is There Not a Cause?
http://www.reformation21.org/blog/2013/11/nietzchean-evangelicalism.php
Saturday, November 30, 2013
Saturday, May 11, 2013
Founders Ministries Blog: Laying Hold of the Truth
Founders Ministries Blog: Laying Hold of the Truth: I love God’s Word and delight in its truth. Yet too often I find that after reading my Bible or hearing a sermon, the truth, so necessary to...
Saturday, March 23, 2013
Andrew Fuller and His Forgotten
Friend: Beeby Wallis
A Friendship Portrait Drawn in Three
Sketches
Sketch One
Friendships are often marked by memorable places and events
as well as by the normal routine of life. Our first sketch remembers a
gathering of some fourteen individuals on October 2, 1792. Present are:William Carey,
Leicester; John Ryland, Northampton; Reynold Hogg, Thrapstone; John Sutcliff,
Olney; Andrew Fuller, Kettering; Abraham Greenwood, Oakham; Edward Sharman,
Cottisbrook; Samuel Pearce, Birmingham; Joseph Timms, Kettering; Joshua Burton,
Foxton; Thomas Blundel, Arnsby; William Heighton, Roade; John Bristol Ayres,
Braybrook; and William Staughton, Bristol.
But for the purpose of this sketch, attention is drawn to
the house in which they meet and to one noticeable absence. The house[ii] is that of Deacon and Mrs
Beeby Wallis. Cathcart said:
“The little parlor
which witnessed the birth of this society was the most honored room in the
British Islands, or in any part of Christendom; in it was formed the first
society of modern time for spreading the gospel among the heathen, the parent
of all the great Protestant missionary societies in existence.”
Andrew Fuller comes to the meeting
bearing the sorrow of his wife’s terrible illness that summer; Fuller was by
his wife’s side twenty two hours a day for the three months; Mrs. Fuller died
in August. He comes to a home also
bearing grief. Absent from the gathering was Beeby Wallis, who had died in
April. Mr. and Mrs.Wallis used their home and their wealth for kingdom work in
their church and the Baptist Mission
even after their deaths.[iii]
Beeby Wallis was Andrew Fuller’s friend.
Sketch Two
Andrew Fuller becomes the
Secretary of the new mission society, continuing as pastor of the Kettering
church where he had ministered since October, 1782. The Baptist Quarterly says:
The chief hinge on which the gates of opportunity turned for
Fuller was his removal to Kettering… Once at Kettering a new world opened out
before Fuller. Ryland junior, at Northhampton, and Sutcliff, at Olney, he
already knew, but they had been inaccessibly remote [in] those pre-railway,
pre-mail coach days. Now they could meet. Pierce was near enough, at Birmingham
to be visited occasionally. That seraphic soul, too good for this hard world,
and destined not long to remain in it, had a strange fascination for rough and
gruff Andrew Fuller, whose private prayers contained thereafter a line of
unusual character: “God of Samuel Pierce, be my God!” Soon young Carey came into their circle, and
the yeasty ferment in that visionary’s mind communicated itself to the group of
brave hearts who were destined to lead a reluctant church forward with the
gospel into the heathen world.[iv]
The Divine hand that seems so
clearly to have brought Fuller to Kettering made use of a human hand as
well. That human agency, more than any
other perhaps, was Beeby Wallis.
Fuller’s first pastorate at Soham
was a struggle financially. Married,
with a young family, Fuller had tried a business and then a school to
supplement a salary that never reached £13 a year. Yet he was fully
devoted to the little church at Soham and it took a year for him to come to the
decision to move to Kettering. His diary records the tears and the trauma for
Fuller and his first church.
Beeby Wallis first sought Fuller out and over
the year through letters and visits made his case for Fuller to come to
Kettering. From that a friendship was
forged that seems to have stood the test of time. Pastor and Deacon would serve together and
find common cause and uncommon cordiality.
Beeby Wallis was appointed a
deacon by Thomas Benford on October 27, 1768. His signature can be found
appended for several years to the Letter to the Association. He also signed the
Covenant and confession of faith for the Kettering church along with John
Brown, Pastor and another Deacon, Joseph Timms – a name that appears among
those gathered to form the Missionary Society. Wallis also served as the first
treasurer of the Particular Baptist Association, from which the Missionary
Society would come.
Sketch Three
The last scene is a funeral service.
Andrew Fuller’s funeral sermon at the death of Beeby Wallis was printed and
published: “The Blessedness of the Dead.”
Fuller speaks of “a steady,
faithful, and judicious friend.”
I have often admired
the wisdom and mercy of God in these things.
We see the threatening hand of God laid upon our dearest friends or
relatives – and at first we think we can never endure the loss – but the
affliction continues – meanwhile the weight which he sustained is gradually
removed, and falls by degrees upon his friends about him – life becomes a
burden to himself - at length the very
same principle that made it appear impossible for us to endure a separation,
renders us incapable of praying or even wishing for his continuance – and thus
the burden that we should scarcely have known how to bear becomes tolerable by
being let down, as it were, gradually upon our shoulders.
About five years after
[Wallis] was chosen to the office of a deacon, an office which he has filled
with honour and satisfaction for twenty-four years. It was a great blessing to the church,
especially when, for the space of five years, they were destitute of a
minister, that he was invested with this office, and was then in the prime of
life and usefulness. It will long be
remembered with what meekness of wisdom he presided in the church during that
uncomfortable interval; and how , notwithstanding all the disadvantages of such
a situation, they were not only preserved in peace, but gradually increased,
till a minister was settled among them.
The stability of the church, and
its ability to support a minister was a crucial factor in the call and coming
of Andrew Fuller to Kettering.
God endued him with a
sound understanding, and his observances on men and things, ripened by long
experience, were just and accurate. He
had a quick sense of right and wrong, of propriety and impropriety, which
rendered his counsel of great esteem in cases of difficulty.
Fuller speaks of an industrious,
diligent, active man but elaborates on Beeby’s most prominent features:
One of the most
prominent features of his character was sincerity, or integrity of heart. This was a temper of mind that ran through
all his concerns. In a cause of
righteousness he possessed a severity which rendered it almost impossible for
treachery to stand before him.
… “I wish to do what is
right,” he would say “and leave
consequences.”
…He would neither
flatter, not be flattered by others. The
true secret by which he obtained esteem, was an unaffected modesty, mingled
with kindness and goodness.
On Beeby Wallis’ tomb, an end
panel bore an inscription said to have been written by Andrew Fuller:
Kind sycamore, preserve,
beneath thy shade,
The precious dust of Him who
cherished thee:
Nor Thee alone; a plant to
him more dear,
He cherished, and with
fost’ring hand upreared.
Active and generous in
Virtue’s cause,
With solid wisdom, strict
integrity,
And unaffected piety, he
lived
Beloved amongst us, and
beloved he died.
Beneath an Allon-Bachuth[v], Jacob wept:
Beneath thy shade we mourn a
heavier loss.
Beeby Wallis was Andrew Fuller’s friend.
He was used of God to bring Fuller to Kettering; to support and sustain
his pastoral ministry there, and to enable Fuller’s wider ministry to the world
with the gospel of Jesus Christ. Late in
his life, Beeby Wallis said, “I reckon it the greatest honour of my Life to
have been employed in promoting the interest of Christ.”
[i]
In
1790, £13 2s 6d would have the same spending worth today of £735.39 ( I estimate about $1200 US dollars.)
[iii]
Mrs. Beeby Wallis, by will proved in Prerogative Court of Canterbury 6 May
1813, gave £400 to the minister and deacons of the Particular Baptist
Congregation upon trust to apply the interest yearly as to £2 10s. to
the minister for preaching occasionally in neighbouring villages, £2 10s.
in Bibles and hymn books for poor of congregation, £5 to poor of congregation,
£4 10s. in repair of Meeting House and residue for minister. The money
was invested in Consols, which were sold in 1897, and the proceeds, £455 1s.,
after being placed on mortgage were subsequently invested in £480 17s. 7d.
5 per cent. War Stock, with the Official Trustees, producing £24 0s. 10d.
yearly. In 1924 £16 10s. was placed to the general fund of Fuller
Chapel, £2 10s. to the Hymn Book and Bible Fund, and £5 was distributed
to the poor.
[v]
The KJV transliterated this as “oak of weeping.”
Selected Bibliography
Brewster, Paul. Andrew Fuller:
Model Pastor-Theologian.Nashville: B&H Publishing Group. 2010
Fuller, Andrew. The Blessedness of
the Dead. Reproduction from British Library. London: ECCO . 1792
Fuller, Andrew Gunton, Editor. The Complete Works of Andrew Fuller. Edinburgh:
Banner of Truth. Reprint, 2007.
Taylor, John, Historical
Collections relating to Northamptonshire. Northhampton: Taylor & Sons.
1896. Reprint.
The Baptist Quarterly BiblicalStudies.org.uk: Baptist
Quarterly Vols. 1 - 3 (1922 - 1927)
Top Ten Reasons Sports Should be Banned in America
9. The perpetuation of gender inequities continues without any sign of ultimate resolution.
8. The carbon footprint of sports in America is larger than that of the general population of Europe and South America combined.
7. Injuries and deaths continue to accumulate among participants and spectators.
6. The religious devotion of fans to teams, many of which utilize public-financed facilities, is a defacto violation of the separation of church and state.
5. The announcers, color commentators and analysts are systematically destroying the proper use of language and logic.
4. The lost revenue, due to unreported gambling proceeds, hinders the expansion of the welfare state that we all envision as best for America.
3. The pyramid structure of sports is designed to eliminate more and more participants at each higher level with great income received by only a select few at the pinnacle of the Ponzi –like scheme. It reeks of “Capitalism.”
2. The advance of digital graphics allows for the replacement of actual sports with computer-generated models suitable for entertainment at a fraction of the cost.
1. Arenas are sure to be needed when Christianity is outlawed for being hateful and intolerant. The only crimes left to be punished in our perfect society. The Christians could be fed to lions – always highly entertaining and not without historical precedent.
Saturday, September 1, 2012
Only going to ask this once...
Anyone ever had this conversation with a toddler?
Adult: "Do you want cereal or pancakes for breakfast?"
Toddler: "I want ice cream."
Adult: "Listen to the choices: pancakes or cereal."
Adult: "Do you want cereal or pancakes for breakfast?"
Toddler: "I want ice cream."
Adult: "Listen to the choices: pancakes or cereal."
Adult: "Do you want cereal or pancakes for breakfast?"
Toddler: "I want ice cream."
I now close this scene prematurely and leave to your imagination where it goes from there. Could be good; could be bad.
I transpose this conversation now to politics.
Adult: "Do you want Obama or Romney for President?"
Answer the question. Unacceptable toddler answers include any name that is NOT Obama or Romney; toddler answers also include: " I am not going to vote." "I will now have a tantrum because I don't like my choices." And the ever popular: "You are mean!"
Do you want Obama or Romney for President? I am only going to ask this once....
Adult: "Do you want cereal or pancakes for breakfast?"
Toddler: "I want ice cream."
Adult: "Listen to the choices: pancakes or cereal."
Adult: "Do you want cereal or pancakes for breakfast?"
Toddler: "I want ice cream."
Adult: "Listen to the choices: pancakes or cereal."
Adult: "Do you want cereal or pancakes for breakfast?"
Toddler: "I want ice cream."
I now close this scene prematurely and leave to your imagination where it goes from there. Could be good; could be bad.
I transpose this conversation now to politics.
Adult: "Do you want Obama or Romney for President?"
Answer the question. Unacceptable toddler answers include any name that is NOT Obama or Romney; toddler answers also include: " I am not going to vote." "I will now have a tantrum because I don't like my choices." And the ever popular: "You are mean!"
Do you want Obama or Romney for President? I am only going to ask this once....
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Ashamed of God: Why Peter Enns Gets It Wrong, Again.
Dr. Peter Enns recently engaged Pastor John Piper (here) on the Biblical record of God's judgment of the Canaanites. Dr. Piper's answer to the question (How Could God Kill Women and Children?) can be found on his site.
Dr. Peter Enns parted ways with Westminster Theological Seminary some years back over his views of inspiration and, coincidentally, the issue at the heart of his exchange with Piper. Enns left BioLogos a few months ago and was quoted as saying, "They are moving in a more conservative direction, i.e., keeping Southern Baptists and other literalists on board."
In this exchange, Enns highlights Piper's opening statement, who in a typical Piperian flourish presents his view in bold, almost, shocking frankness. Nevertheless, Piper does state the Biblical view correctly.
The judgment of the Canaanites, promised by God in Genesis 15:16, was to follow 400 years of mercy and warning. The destruction of Sodom was an early warning sign to that culture. Abraham, Melchisedek, Isaac and others spoke of and for God to that culture.
My point in this brief essay is to simply point out why Dr Enns gets this all wrong. Sadly his error is very simple.
First, his view of God is wrong. Peter Enns makes his god in the image of Peter Enns. Enns decides what is right and wrong and "God" must conduct himself accordingly. The God of the Bible embarrasses Enns.
Second, his view of Scripture is wrong. Enns insists that Divine judgment is inconsistent with the message of the New Testament. He ignores Christ's warning that judgment for Tyre and Sidon will be worse than that of Sodom.
Enns gets it wrong.
Dr. Peter Enns parted ways with Westminster Theological Seminary some years back over his views of inspiration and, coincidentally, the issue at the heart of his exchange with Piper. Enns left BioLogos a few months ago and was quoted as saying, "They are moving in a more conservative direction, i.e., keeping Southern Baptists and other literalists on board."
In this exchange, Enns highlights Piper's opening statement, who in a typical Piperian flourish presents his view in bold, almost, shocking frankness. Nevertheless, Piper does state the Biblical view correctly.
The judgment of the Canaanites, promised by God in Genesis 15:16, was to follow 400 years of mercy and warning. The destruction of Sodom was an early warning sign to that culture. Abraham, Melchisedek, Isaac and others spoke of and for God to that culture.
My point in this brief essay is to simply point out why Dr Enns gets this all wrong. Sadly his error is very simple.
First, his view of God is wrong. Peter Enns makes his god in the image of Peter Enns. Enns decides what is right and wrong and "God" must conduct himself accordingly. The God of the Bible embarrasses Enns.
Second, his view of Scripture is wrong. Enns insists that Divine judgment is inconsistent with the message of the New Testament. He ignores Christ's warning that judgment for Tyre and Sidon will be worse than that of Sodom.
Enns gets it wrong.
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Meeting the Enemy
I was 5 hours away, blessedly exempt from the chicken pox
quarantine, when my wife called to tell me the doctor thought the baby had, perhaps,
a broken bone in her hand. I preached
that night and drove home. When we
finally got the correct diagnosis, I was furious with the first pediatrician
and my anger added to my wife’s anxiety.
Monitoring the spider bite was surreal as we watched our
baby that night – what were we watching for I wondered? Then it passed; I did not know how much that
episode would take from us just then.
Hindsight tells me I should have been more observant
about the stress levels all these things cumulatively were adding. I have never
discussed the anonymous calls we were receiving – ominous calls – vague but
more frequent when I was out of town.
I am hesitant even now to talk about the
spiritual warfare that was being waged in and around us. I would later learn about some of it and some
of it I would never fathom or grasp. We turned over some rocks in that ministry
that revealed racism, prejudice and hatred that still today sadden me. God
granted some victories and some courage; but I did not know at what cost they
were coming.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)